Grammar Methods and Presentation: How Should Grammar Be Taught?

-

TESL 0110
Unit 2 Reflection

Grammar Methods:
I don't necessarily think that there is a right or wrong answer to this question, and as I read the history of methods presented in Thornbury's Grammar and methods, I saw that a variety of methods have, and still exist. I found it fascinating to read through the evolution of methods and to see how current beliefs and practices actually incorporate elements from many of the methods of the past. 
Learning a second language, and "picking it up" through immersion and repeated exposure, as in the Direct Method and the Natural Approach, are based on Noam Chomsky's belief that we have an "innate capacity" to learn languages. According to these methods, it is not necessary to explicitly teach grammar; we will acquire grammatical knowledge in a natural and automatic way, just as we did as children when we learned our first language. Deep-end Communicative Language Teaching was rooted in similar ideas. It also omitted the inclusion of grammar rules and focused on task completion.  I would group these methods closer to the zero-grammar end of the spectrum.
Grammar Translation, and what was referred to as Shallow-end Communicative Language Teaching, had grammar as the foundation or basis of their program. The rules of grammar were more explicitly taught and practiced through examples, exercises or functions. These methods incorporated the use and explanation of grammar terminology. These methods would be found at the heavy-grammar end of the spectrum.
Task-based learning, Focus on Form, and the idea of consciousness-raising seem to me to be in the middle of the spectrum and combine the best of both worlds. They include bringing the grammatical forms to the attention of the students so that students can notice, understand and remember them, but focus primarily on communicative tasks.  
One particular statement from Thornbury that really struck me was, "communicative competence is best achieved through communicating, through making meanings, and . . . grammar is a way of tidying these meanings up." (p. 25). This seems to sum up my (current) philosophy of teaching grammar. I think it is best to teach grammar through an integrated approach, within the context of a communicative task. This reading strengthened my belief in teaching grammar in this manner.



Presentation of Grammar
There are two contrasting ways in which grammar can be presented to students in a language classroom. In the Deductive Approach, a learner is presented with a grammatical rule with examples and then applies that rule in practice exercises that are often very structured and mechanical. It is a teacher-centered approach with the teacher as the knowledge-giver. The Inductive Approach, on the other hand, invites students to explore and speculate on a structure in context. Students are given the opportunity to notice or identify grammatical rules in more of a discovery approach. This approach is student-centered with the teacher as a facilitator or guide. 
Both the deductive and inductive approach have their pros and cons and can be used for students of different ages and types. Ideally I would choose to use a mix of the two, without ruling out one approach entirely. There are multiple factors to consider when selecting the best teaching and learning method for our students.: The language needs of the students, their goals, their learning styles, the type of class, and the topic of the lesson are some of the things that a teacher should take into consideration before selecting the method of instruction.
Given a choice, I would use a combination of methods. Students need to have a purpose for learning grammar and should then be able to apply it in a realistic context. I like to think of grammar teaching as a mini-lesson within the larger frame of an integrated skills lesson.  I believe that transfer is one of the most important principles of language instruction. As their teachers, we need to help students see and make meaningful connections. We need to help them connect what they are learning now to their background knowledge, to what they have previously learned, and to other skill areas. In this format, students are more likely to internalize and transfer the information, resulting in deeper learning.
References:
Thornbury, S. (1999). How to teach grammar, Chapter 2: Why teach grammar? pp. 21-27. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.
Sikorzynska, A. (1995). Discover it yourself (pp. 8-9 & pp. 82-85). Wydawnictiwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Continued Professional Development Report

-
Image
TESL 0170 Practicum in Teaching ESL The professional development resource that I selected to engage with and analyze is the free online CLB Bootcamp provided by the Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks. The CLB Bootcamp is a 10-hour self-directed online training course that introduces and explains the CLB’s, as well as how to use the CLB’s for lesson planning and student assessment. The CLB Bootcamp is divided into three modules: CLB Basics , Planning and the CLB and Classroom Assessment and the CLB . Each module is then broken down into three to four sections. The material is presented in a format similar to a PowerPoint presentation, with links to resources, documents and example materials. There are also optional short quizzes throughout that can be taken more than once. It is not necessary to complete the sections or modules in order, or even to complete them all. You can pick and choose which areas you want to learn more about. If you do complete all of the modules...
Read more

My Classroom Community

-
Image
TESL 0100 So I kind of overlooked this assignment, or maybe I was procrastinating it and avoiding it because I am not much of an artist and was not really looking forward to attempting to draw my classroom. :) I tried to do some of the parts in 3D, but other parts are much more basic. It's kind of a mix of both. Attempting to draw a couch was the trickiest part! Anyways, I like to think of my classroom as a community of learners, which is why I used a circular table with me, the teacher (the one with the speech bubble), as part of the circle. When needed, everyone can turn their chairs toward the whiteboard for direct instruction, or to read sentence stems or discussion prompts. I would put our agenda on the board so the students would know what was in store for the day. There would also be a word wall bulletin board with high frequency words and words we had learned in previous lessons. The classroom would have a bookshelf with a wide variety of reading materials and games/...
Read more

21st Century Learners

-
Image
TESL 0100 Unit 9 Reflection As we begin to think about the language classroom that we may be teaching in, we need need to also take a step back and consider what teaching and learning looks like in the twenty-first century. We were asked to think about the skills, tasks and technologies that our students would need to have an understanding of in order to be successful in today's world, and to create an infographic to represent our ideas. Below is the infographic that I created. It includes the skills and strategies that I believe are needed by all students, including language students. In order to succeed in today's ever-changing world, students need to be taught more than just the basic knowledge and skills that were taught in traditional classroom. The four key skills that I have highlighted - communication, collaboration, creativity and critical thinking, often referred to as the four C's, should be an important component to any classroom. In university, the workp...
Read more